Shams al-Ma'arif: The Mysterious Book of The Sun of Gnosis

The mysterious book known as Shams al-Ma'arif (The Sun of Gnosis) is arguably the most recognized and feared grimoire within the Islamicate world. Its full title, Shams al-Ma'arif wa Lata'if al-'Awarif (The Sun of Knowledge and Subtleties of the Learned), belies the notorious reputation it carries as a manual for dangerous Arabic magic and esoteric spirituality. The position of the book is characterized by extreme polarization: to its devoted practitioners, it functions as an esoteric manual for achieving proximity to the Divine through the revelation of sacred secrets; conversely, its detractors condemn it as a perilous compendium of dark magic, capable of luring readers into a world of sorcery, jinn, curses, and rank superstition. The government of Saudi Arabia imposed a ban on the book, after its first modern era printing in Beirut on 1985. 

The introduction of the Book early of 17th century (Image source: Wikipedia )  

The contemporary discourse surrounding the book is universally defined by the Arabic term khaṭar, meaning danger or peril. This refers to an immediate, palpable spiritual and physical risk associated not merely with theological transgression, but with the very act of engaging with the text, whether through reading, owning, or attempting its rituals. This concept of khaṭar is the cultural manifestation of the belief that the book is inherently "cursed."

The historical foundation of the book rests upon the revered figure of Ahmad al-Buni. Born in Buna (modern Annaba, Algeria), al-Buni was a 13th-century North African Sufi scholar, polymath, and mathematician who flourished in Ayyubid Egypt and was a contemporary of the renowned mystic Ibn Arabi. Al-Buni made profound and authentic contributions to various esoteric and technical disciplines. For instance, he wrote extensively on mathematics, detailing the construction of magic squares using bordering techniques and utilizing Latin squares derived from the permutation of the 99 names of God. His works on traditional healing also remain points of reference among Muslim healers in regions such as Nigeria.

Despite his authentic scholarship, al-Buni’s identity has been dramatically overshadowed by the controversial book attributed to him. In popular culture, he is now frequently remembered as an "infamous arch-sorcerer," a reputation largely detached from his original Sufi and mathematical works.

The widespread narrative of the book's curse highlights a profound and enduring theological and methodological fault line within Islam—the tension between orthodox religious sources and esoteric, mystic approaches. Sufis traditionally engage in deep study of divine names and texts, aiming to uncover hidden spiritual meanings (ta'wil). Critics, however, argue that this intensive focus on the occult leads to dangerous deviation, specifically into the forbidden realm of sihr (sorcery) and the manipulation of jinn. The book’s simultaneous claim to deep spiritual gnosis (knowledge) and its detailed instructions for physical and worldly manipulation force a dramatic confrontation across this fault line. The modern "curse" narrative functions as the sociological projection of the orthodox objection, serving as a concrete cultural deterrent intended to prevent individuals from exploring unauthorized esoteric knowledge.

An Algerian manuscript of the Shams al-Ma'arif from 1868 (Khalili Collection of Islamic Art). (Image source: Wikipedia)

To critically analyze the reputation of Shams al-Ma'arif, it is necessary to establish a clear distinction between the authentic work of Ahmad al-Buni and the monumental grimoire that carries his name.

The genuine treatise, possibly titled Shams al-Ma'arif wa Lata'if al-'Awarif, is suggested to be a shorter, authentic work by al-Buni, potentially focusing on Sufi cosmology and esoteric science consistent with his known scholarly interests.

However, the text notorious throughout the Islamicate world is the much larger, pseudepigraphic compilation known as Shams al-Ma'arif al-Kubra (The Great Sun of Gnosis). While traditionally attributed solely to al-Buni, modern scholarship consistently disputes his authorship of the expansive text. It is understood to be a compilation, described as a "patchwork of bits and pieces of al-Buni's authentic works, and texts by other unknown authors". Crucially, manuscripts of al-Kubra do not appear in the historical record until the 17th century, nearly five centuries after al-Buni’s death, confirming it as the product of later esoteric traditions.

Al-Buni’s name and reputation became a powerful legitimizing brand for subsequent generations of occult practitioners, leading to the development of the corpus Bunianum—a body of magical texts written in his tradition, often falsely attributed to him.

A significant contributor to this corpus was the 15th-century Ottoman scholar Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad al-Bistami. Al-Bistami extensively commentated on Buni's works, with his own focus centering specifically on detailed instructions for creating magical amulets and talismans. This explicit, operational magic was then incorporated into the compilation of Shams al-Ma'arif al-Kubra alongside authentic fragments of al-Buni’s work.

The subsequent danger ascribed to the book is largely a function of this pseudepigraphic branding and textual aggregation. Later, often more explicit and controversial, magical texts were deliberately collected and attributed to the respected 13th-century Sufi master, al-Buni, in order to lend them undeniable authority and ancient pedigree. This textual strategy effectively transferred the theological risk (the "sins") inherent in the forbidden, later materials directly onto the reputation of the original author. The act of compiling these diverse works under a single, revered name created the composite, dangerous manuscript, thereby retroactively damning the original legacy and manufacturing the book’s unparalleled notoriety.

The danger attributed to Shams al-Ma'arif al-Kubra stems directly from its detailed instruction in forbidden esoteric practices, many of which utilize the sacred architecture of Islam for profane ends.

Central to the text is ʿIlm al-Ḥurūf, the science of letters, which is the Islamic equivalent of Gematria or numerology. This discipline assigns numerical values (abjad values) to the 28 letters of the Arabic alphabet to infer hidden meanings, reveal secret messages, and tap into spiritual power derived from the divine creative act.

The practical application of this knowledge involves the construction of talismans and magic squares (murabba'at sihriyya). The book provides elaborate guidelines for arranging numbers and letters, often corresponding to the 99 names of Allah (Asma al-husna), into grid formations with specific esoteric properties intended for purposes such as protection, prosperity, or influencing others. Practitioners believe that by reciting the names of God or angels during the crafting process, they draw down divine power into the material object, imbuing it with spiritual potency.

The text places a significant emphasis on astrological determination (ʿIlm al-Nujūm), arguing that the efficacy of any magical operation depends heavily on its precise timing relative to celestial influences. Chapters of the book detail the esoteric correspondence between the 28 Arabic letters and the 28 Mansions of the Moon, demonstrating how the lunar positions define the appropriate spiritual environment for executing specific magical operations.

Perhaps the most controversial and dangerous aspect is the detailed instruction for the invocation of spiritual entities, including both angels (muwakilin) and jinn (khuddām). These rituals demand rigorous esoteric preparation, requiring practitioners to undergo periods of fasting, maintain ritual purity, and engage in frequent exercises of praise (dhikr) to achieve the necessary spiritual state. The ultimate goal is often to summon a "servant" (khadim), a powerful entity—sometimes described as manifesting in the form of a dog-like jinn—to execute commands related to worldly desires, separation, health, or black sorcery (sihr).

The text is viewed as dangerous because it artfully integrates legitimate devotional practices (purification, dhikr, use of divine names) with illicit, materialistic objectives (commanding jinn, manipulating physical reality). This hybridization makes the text theologically insidious, as pious, Sufi-like acts are redirected away from pure devotion toward what critics define as forbidden associationism or spiritual manipulation. This conflation of sacred means and profane ends confirms the grimoire’s reputation as a guide to dangerous transgression.

The reputation of Shams al-Ma'arif as a "cursed" book is ultimately rooted in the unwavering theological condemnation by mainstream Islamic scholars and jurists who view its contents as a profound violation of Tawhid (the oneness of God).

Criticism of the book is longstanding, dating back to the Mamluk era. The 14th-century jurist Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328 CE) famously articulated this orthodox stance, criticizing the author of the corpus Bunianum and labeling him a "deluded devil (Shaytan) worshipper".

Islamic jurisprudence universally prohibits sihr (sorcery), defining it as magic accessed through acts that involve reliance upon, or invocation of, entities other than God, or rituals designed to bypass natural law for unauthorized ends. The text’s methodology, especially Ilm al-Huruf, is rejected because scholars contend it presumes access to hidden cosmic knowledge belonging solely to the Divine and manipulates sacred material (such as the names of God) outside the sanctioned methods of the Qur'an and Sunnah.

The most severe theological charge leveled against the book’s contents is that they lead to shirk (polytheism or associationism), the only unforgivable sin in Islam. This violation occurs in two primary ways:

1. Talismans and Tawakkul: The creation and utilization of talismans or amulets, even those incorporating numerical arrangements of divine names, are condemned because they instill reliance (tawakkul) on the object itself, rather than absolute reliance on God. Scholars argue that this practice forms a "subtle gateway to shirk," rooted in ignorance and superstition, and is strictly prohibited regardless of whether the symbols are Qur'anic or non-Qur'anic.
2. Reliance on Jinn and Entities: Seeking assistance, protection, or the fulfillment of needs through the summoning and command of spiritual servants (jinn) is viewed as a clear deviation from Tawhid. By compromising the sole reliance on God, the practitioner effectively allies with forbidden entities, thus compromising the core monotheistic principle.

The theological condemnation has consistently translated into institutional and legal action. The text carries a notorious reputation for having been "suppressed and banned for much of Islamic history," confirming persistent religious and political opposition to its circulation.

In the modern era, the condemnation has been standardized and enforced by religious establishments. Following a printing in Beirut in 1985, the government of Saudi Arabia formally imposed a ban on the book. Furthermore, high-ranking Saudi scholars, notably Sheikh Ibn Jibrin—a member of the Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta—issued specific fatwas forbidding the reading, possession, and study of the Shams al-Ma'arif.

This modern history demonstrates the standardization of theological prohibition, particularly by Salafi jurisprudence. The formal state ban and high-level fatwas since the late 20th century transformed the book from merely a controversial esoteric text into a universally recognized heretical object, thereby codifying the concept of the "curse" into institutional law and policy.

Beyond theological decree, the enduring status of Shams al-Ma'arif as "cursed" is maintained by a powerful body of folklore and anecdotal accounts, known collectively as khaṭar narratives, which translate abstract spiritual risk into terrifying, immediate consequence.

The text itself offers a chilling self-warning, noting that ignorance or carelessness in practicing its teachings can lead directly to "unintended consequences and potentially harmful outcomes". Across the Islamic world, widespread urban legends and testimonies circulate detailing the misfortunes of those who attempted the book’s rituals. These reports include serious mental breakdowns, physical ailments, and spiritual possession by jinn. Specific narratives, such as the account of female students who were allegedly possessed following reckless experimentation with the text, serve as stark cautionary tales, reinforcing the concept that the book holds a dark and dangerous power.

One of the most potent modern legends supporting the curse is the fate of al-Sayyid al-Ḥusaynī al-Falakī (d. 2003). Al-Falakī was a high-profile 20th-century Egyptian practitioner and astrologer to celebrities, heavily invested in al-Būnian magic. He is popularly believed to have been killed by a jinn in his Giza home. Anecdotal accounts surrounding his death claim that his face was found "horrifically contorted," and while the official cause of death was mysteriously "unclear," the narrative has solidified in the public imagination as definitive proof of jinn retaliation. Prior to his death, al-Falakī’s invocation of a jinn on a 1988 film set was rumored to have caused "weird happenings" among the actors.

These highly specific and gruesome anecdotes involving real-world figures function as extremely effective cultural deterrents. They transform the abstract theological prohibitions against shirk into concrete, observable realities of immediate spiritual and physical calamity. The narrative of the curse acts as a powerful, performative moral judgment, compelling the lay populace to maintain established religious boundaries through fear of the occult.

The fear of khaṭar has adapted seamlessly to the digital environment. Popular belief now dictates that merely owning a physical copy endangers one’s life, and even attempting to download a digital PDF is an invitation to both computer viruses and demons. This contemporary folklore ensures that the book retains its dangerous, forbidden quality even in the age of rapid electronic dissemination.

Despite these intense theological, legal, and cultural warnings, the text’s circulation persists. It continues to be sought out and exchanged clandestinely, often at steep prices, sustaining its appeal among occult enthusiasts, folk healers, and those interested in exploring the boundaries of Islamic esoteric thought.

The status of Shams al-Ma'arif al-Kubra as a "cursed" book is not an accident of history but the structured, cumulative result of three intersecting forces: textual evolution, theological condemnation, and cultural fear.

The controversy originates with the aggressive aggregation of explicit, operational sihr into the monumental al-Kubra compilation, strategically utilizing the historical authority of the respected Sufi scholar Ahmad al-Buni (pseudepigrapha). This authoritative compilation then faced unwavering theological classification as a guide to shirk (polytheism) by mainstream Islamic jurists who prohibited its core practices, such as talisman construction and jinn summoning. Finally, the pervasive cultural dissemination of tragic folklore, or khaṭar narratives—like the tales of possession and the alleged death of al-Falakī—provided the terrifying cultural justification necessary to enforce the religious boundaries. The institutional bans and specific fatwas in the modern era merely codified this pre-existing cultural terror into state and religious law.

Ultimately, the Shams al-Ma'arif functions as a sociological barometer, powerfully illustrating the historical tensions between mainstream Sunni orthodoxy and the persistent, complex traditions of Islamic mysticism and occult science.

This dynamic creates a profound paradox: the text promises Shams al-Ma'arif (The Sun of Gnosis), offering a path to divine knowledge. Yet, the pursuit of this hidden knowledge via unsanctioned magical means inevitably leads to spiritual darkness, validating the popular perception of the curse. This dangerous status is intrinsically maintained by the text itself. The book provides formulas for tremendous spiritual power derived from divine nomenclature, but the necessary prerequisites for safe practice—such as true spiritual authority (ijāza), advanced purity, and sanctioned lineage—are practically unattainable by the average clandestine reader. The almost guaranteed failure, unintended consequence, or spiritual calamity resulting from unauthorized attempts thus reinforces the "curse" narrative, effectively transforming the grimoire into a self-policing mechanism that safeguards forbidden knowledge.

References:

• Shams al-Ma'arif - Wikipedia
• Shams al-Maarif: Why is this mystic book feared in the Middle East?
• Narratives of Danger: The Sun of Knowledge in Arabic Occulture ...
• Shams al-Ma'arif — The Most Dangerous Book in the World? | by Raihan | ILLUMINATION
• Ahmad al-Buni - Wikipedia
• About: Ahmad al-Buni
• The Shams al-Ma'arif: Ancient Book of Arabian Magic - Historic Mysteries
• Kitab Shams Al Maarif | PDF | Religious Faiths | Esotericism - Scribd
• Shams al-Ma'arif - Wikiwand
• 'Ilm al-huruf - Wikipedia
• Shams al-Ma'arif: A Comprehensive Exploration of the Book of Magic and Mysticism
• Shams al-Ma'arift: a 13th century book of islamic mysticism. While it managed to survive until the modern age, the book has been frequently condemned and considered taboo in most of the islamic world as it allegedly is an introduction to dangerous magic. No full english translation exists[1500x843] : r/ArtefactPorn - Reddit
• Shams al-Ma'arif - the Mansions of the Moon
• The Birhatīya Conjuration Oath and The Meaning of Its First 28 Names | PDF | Jinn - Scribd
• Islam and magic - Wikipedia
• Inauthenticity of 'Ilm Al-Huroof wal-Awfaaq - إسلام ويب
• Shirk Through Amulets: A Hidden Gateway to Polytheism | EN.tohed.com